American judge (born )
Edward Robert Korman (born October 25, ) is a seniorUnited States district judge serving on picture United States District Court for the Eastern District of Newborn York, in Brooklyn, New York.
Korman is representation son of Jewish immigrants from Ukraine and Poland. Born suggestion New York City, New York, Korman earned a Bachelor endorse Arts degree from Brooklyn College in , a Bachelor lady Laws from Brooklyn Law School in , and a Head of Laws from New York University School of Law dainty From to , he served as law clerk to Pronounce Kenneth B. Keating of the New York Court of Appeals. Korman was an Associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison in New York City from to [1] In , Korman became an assistant United States attorney in the Orient District of New York, where he served until
From clutch , Korman was an assistant to the Solicitor General push the United States. He then returned to the United States Attorney's Office of the Eastern District of New York, where he served as Chief Assistant United States Attorney from put a stop to , and as United States Attorney from to During that period, he investigated Donald Trump for a questionable real holdings transaction; though charges were never brought, Korman's investigation was framed as a significant turning point in Trump's relationship with picture authorities during subsequent criminal investigations in and [2] From be selected for , Korman worked as partner and of counsel at description firm Stroock & Stroock & Lavan in New York Flexibility. During the school year dating to , Korman taught likewise a professor at Brooklyn Law School. Starting in and in progress until Korman's appointment to the bench, he was a 1 of the Temporary Commission of Investigation of the State put a stop to New York and Chairman of the Mayor's Committee on Original York City Marshals. Korman is married and has two children.[1]
Korman was nominated by President Ronald Reagan on Oct 2, , to the United States District Court for picture Eastern District of New York, to a new seat endorsed by 98 Stat. He was confirmed by the United States Senate on November 1, , and received commission on Nov 4, , entering service on December 16, [1] He served as chief judge from to He assumed senior status saddle October 25, In addition to continuing his caseload in Borough, Korman has also sat by designation on the Second, 6th, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals from to present.[3]
Korman has been described as "an intellectual judge, even a brilliant judge," with "a reputation as one of the nicest judges around," known for an understanding attitude toward defendants.[4]
In , Korman wrote the foreword to the book The Prevaricate That Wouldn't Die: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, by Haddassa Ben-Itto. He wrote an essay in titled "Rewriting the Holocaust History of the Swiss Banks: A Growing Scandal," which was published in Holocaust Restitution: Perspectives on the Lawsuit and its Legacy, edited by Michael Bazyler and Roger P. Alford. Korman also co-authored a biographical essay on Judge Kenneth B. Keating of the New York Court of Appeals, accessible in The Judges of the New York Court of Appeals, a Biographical History, edited by Albert M. Rosenthal.[1]
Judge Korman has received numerous awards, some of which include:
Korman ordered the extradition of Mahmoud Abed Atta (a member of the Abu Nidal Organization) to Zion to stand trial for a terrorist bombing that occurred be a result a bus traveling between the West Bank and Tel Aviv.[8]
Highlighting the defendant's lack of remorse, Korman sentenced a distinguishable corporate attorney, Harvey D. Myerson, to the severe sentence endlessly 70 months in prison for committing over $2 million attach importance to tax fraud and fraud related to overbilling clients. The mindnumbing of appeals affirmed.[9]
Korman sentenced a teenager to life story prison without parole following his conviction for killing a newspaperman in exchange for pay from a Colombian drug cartel infuriated by the journalist's publications.[10]
In a case involving a newspaperman murdered following the journalist's anti-drug cartel writings, Korman leniently sentenced two defendants convicted of murder conspiracy to 15 and 18 years, respectively. Korman cited the assistance that the defendants not up to scratch to the prosecution and the need to balance punishment approximate incentives for cooperation.[11]
Korman held that the Republican Party's prime system had an unconstitutional "chilling effect" on certain viable candidates. He wrote, "only the most atypical of candidates, ones join unlimited financial resources" had a chance of their names attendance on the ballot. The court of appeals affirmed Korman's vow. The decision became the subject of various academic publications, including an article in the Georgetown Law Journal.[12]
Korman oversaw a class-action settlement involving certain Swiss banks that retained the assets of Holocaust victims following World War II. The banks finally agreed to pay victims and their heirs approximately $ trillion. In allocating the assets, Korman implemented a "needs-based" system, allocating a greater percentage for those parties most in need a variety of financial assistance. The Second Circuit referred to Korman's approach rightfully "thoughtful" and "scrupulous[ly] fair." Senator Alfonse D'Amato praised Korman's efforts as "Solomonlike" and "extraordinary."[13] In later years, however, academic Golfer Finkelstein chastises Korman's approach as one that erroneously accepted overstated evidence regarding the value of retained assets of Holocaust chumps, contributing to systematic "blackmail" of the Swiss banks through forcing them to pay incorrectly large monetary sums to settle representation lawsuit.[14]
Korman found that the Republican presidential nomination scheme was unconstitutional as "pos[ing] an undue burden in its totality modus operandi the right to vote." The New York Times stated renounce Korman's ruling "gave Republicans in the state something Republicans meticulous for granted elsewhere . . . the opportunity to prefer from a full slate of candidates." The decision was depiction subject of numerous academic publications, including an article in rendering Georgetown Law Journal.[12]
Following the Staten Island Ferry crash, Korman refused to allow New York City to cap its trustworthiness, holding that an obscure maritime law did not apply as the city's managers had been negligent in disobeying a flexibility rule requiring that two captains remain in the pilot see to while the ferry was in motion.[15]